The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
My personal thoughts on same sex marriage.
in Religion
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
May G-d bless you in all ways
  Considerate: 41%  
  Substantial: 52%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
We fight for gay marriage not because we just want a piece of paper, we fight for gay marriage because marriage offers significant legal protections between two people who love and are devoted to each other.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 46%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 23%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
That said, if marriage is to exist, then it should apply to any couple of consented individuals, regardless of anything. The society has no say on what is "true love" and what is "deviation"; it is not up to anyone to decide, but to the individuals.
I do not think, however, that homosexual marriage should be legalized on the federal level. Each state's population should come to the conclusion of its necessity in due time, throughout discussions and debates. Legalizing it by force on the whole US population, even though it is a good thing, can have serious negative long-term consequences, including the possibility of enactment of the opposite law in the future.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 24%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
The issue is that Marriage is a public likely-hood a form of contract with a witness on a union which has potential to create a citizen of a nation. What you are arguing by debate is that a word created to identify a single entity is outdated and unnecessary.
If this had been true everything could simply be filed in one huge category instead of labeled tables of content. The idea of plagiarism having an alibi does not make the perjury a witness is asked to make legal. Laws that outline discrimination do not make the perjury of a witness legal, this forced perjury demanded by the people who requesting a public witness to receive credit can simply be broken by objection. As the complexity of proving perjury makes it hard to establish in a court of law unless it is confessed or admitted, this is only if the person forced to tell a lie knows or completely understands the lie.
The fact is not everyone has an ability to defend a united state by construction on equal level so the outcry for publicly recognized identification has consequence, experience becomes a facture in outcome when placing truth as a public test on a witnessed event. Binivir and Unosmulier are simply visual accounts of a likely-hood that is either become object to, or stand outside the general observable union of Marriage.
From the start with help by unconstitutional use of law the act of plagiarizing is taking place, this plagiarizing then translates into perjury on the account of the witness as a crime. It should also be noted that the wording like homosexual marriage creates are expectations placed on witness of a explicit sexual behavior which creates other issues. Remember marriage is wording a union between a man and woman as these two type person can produce a citizen of a nation, effort has gone into this public identification and the witness account does not describe the sexual activity required to minors. As this group of people are also public witnesses to these kinds of events.
Religion is the accuse used by legal argument to avoid the problems created form plagiarism past efforts by representation in a civil court case. The issue here is that the legal process would have directed these type unions to adhere to corporate law to which the union of male to male, female to female partnership have precedent, making adjustments to tax code in a more uniform manner.  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.22  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 23%  
  Learn More About Debra